War poetry

War poetry is poetry on the topic of war. While the term is applied especially to works of the First World War.  This blog is a thinking activity based on that, assigned by Vaidehi ma’am. For further information, you can check out her blog here - War Poetry. 

1. Difference of all the war poets. 

The war poets that we encountered in this unit are: Rupert Brooke, Wilfred Owen, Siegfried Sassoon, Wilfrid Wilson Gibson and Ivor Gurney. All of them possess a unique poetic style. They have different view on war and the focus of their poetry also differ from each other. To analyse these differences you can study the chart given below:-

Poet	View on War	Poetic Style	Focus
Rupert Brooke	Glorified, patriotic	Traditional forms, sonnets	Heroism, sacrifice
Wilfred Owen	Deeply critical, disillusioned	Free verse, vivid imagery, metaphors	Individual soldier's experience, psychological & physical wounds
Siegfried Sassoon	Initially patriotic, later critical & satirical	Satirical tone, bitter irony, dark humor	Disillusionment with official narratives, critique of leadership & war glorification
Wilfrid Wilson Gibson	Human cost, impact on communities	Realistic depictions, simple language	Social impact, loss, grief
Ivor Gurney	Personal journey, exploring mental health	Lyrical, introspective	Mental health struggles, search for meaning

Rupert Brooke glorified and portrayed war in a patriotic light, using traditional forms like sonnets to highlight heroism and sacrifice. In contrast, Wilfred Owen took a deeply critical and disillusioned stance, employing free verse, vivid imagery, and metaphors to depict the individual soldier's harrowing experiences and psychological/physical wounds.

Siegfried Sassoon initially embraced patriotism but later became critical and satirical, using a bitter, ironic tone and dark humor to disillusion official narratives and critique the glorification of war and its leadership.

Wilfrid Wilson Gibson focused on the human cost and social impact of war on communities, using realistic depictions and simple language to convey loss and grief.

Ivor Gurney's poetry was a personal journey exploring mental health struggles, with an introspective, lyrical style seeking meaning amidst the trauma.

In short, while Brooke romanticised war heroically, Owen, Sassoon, Gibson, and Gurney offered contrasting, critical perspectives through their distinct poetic voices and styles, highlighting the harsh realities, psychological tolls, and disillusionment with the glorification of conflict.

2. Comparing Rupert Brooke’s “The Soldier” and Wilfred Owen’s “Anthem For Doomed Youth”.

You can check out both of these poems here- 

Subject:-

‘The Soldier’ reflects a romanticised view of war, presenting the death of a soldier as a glorious sacrifice for the homeland. Through this poem, Rupert Brooke portrays a sense of patriotism and nationalism, showcasing the soldier's connection to England as something eternal.

Wilfred Owen's poem, ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ in contrast, provides a stark portrayal of the harsh realities of war, focusing on the tragic and senseless loss of young lives. The subject matter of this poem emphasises the destructive impact of war on the youth, questioning the conventional notions of sacrifice.

Style of Writing:-

Rupert Brooke uses traditional poetic forms as he makes use of sonnet structure and a lyrical style. The language is flowery creating an atmosphere of beauty even when it is used in the context of war.

Wilfred Owen's style, on the other hand, is more modern. He uses vivid and often harsh imagery to depict the brutal nature of war. The poem is structured like a sonnet but differs from traditional sonnet themes, creating a lack of harmony that reflects the disquieting subject matter.

Patriotism:-

‘The Soldier’ displays a strong sense of patriotism, celebrating the soldier's role in serving the nation. The idea of patriotism in this poem is more traditional and positive, aligning with the idea of sacrifice for a greater cause.

Owen, however, challenges conventional notions of patriotism by portraying the grim reality of war and questioning the true value of sacrificing young lives. The poem's critical tone suggests a reevaluation of the traditional patriotic sentiments associated with war.

So while Brooke's "The Soldier" romanticizes war and emphasizes patriotic sacrifice, Owen's "Anthem for Doomed Youth" offers a contrasting perspective that critiques the brutality and futility of war, challenging traditional notions of heroism and patriotism.

3. Do you find any such regional poem/movies/web series/songs which can be compared to any one of the poems given here. Also, give a proper explanation of the similarity.

One Hindi song that I would like to compare with “The Soldier” by Rupert Brooke is “Desh Mere”, from the movie “Bhuj: The Pride of India”. The song is sung by Arijit Singh and written by Manoj Muntashir. You can check out the song here - 

The reason for this comparison is that both these songs present an idealistic sense of honour that is present in the soldiers. These lines from the song best describes the idea that the soldier feels devoted to nation and would readily die for its sake. 

है अर्ज़ ये दीवाने की, जहाँ भोर सुहानी देखी, 

एक रोज़ वहीं मेरी शाम हो

The same sentiments are seen in these lines from the poem - 

“In that rich earth a richer dust concealed;

A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware, 

Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam;

A body of England’s, breathing English air,

      Washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.”

The poet too presents the perspective where the soldier would die happily for his motherland.

In this manner, both these songs presents a similar mindset of the soldiers who would sacrifice anything for their nation.

Words- 900

Images- 5

Videos-3

Analysis of Yeats’ Poems

William Butler Yeats (1865-1939) was an Irish poet, playwright, and key figure in 20th-century literature. Born in Dublin, Ireland, Yeats grew up amidst the political and cultural turbulence of the late 19th century, which deeply influenced his work. He co-founded the Abbey Theatre in Dublin and played a significant role in the Irish Literary Revival, alongside figures like Lady Gregory and John Millington Synge. Yeats’ poetry is known for its lyrical beauty, rich symbolism, and exploration of Irish folklore, mythology, and national identity. Throughout his prolific career, Yeats wrote some of the most enduring poems in the English language, including “The Lake Isle of Innisfree,” “The Second Coming,” and “Sailing to Byzantium.” He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1923 for his “inspired poetry, which in a highly artistic form gives expression to the spirit of a whole nation.” Yeats’ legacy continues to influence poets and writers around the world, and his contributions to literature remain celebrated to this day. This blog is a thinking activity assigned by Barad Sir based on poems of William Butler Yeats. 

On Being Asked a War Poem 

Poem:- 

I think it better that in times like these 

A poet's mouth be silent, for in truth 

We have no gift to set a statesman right; 

He has had enough of meddling who can please 

A young girl in the indolence of her youth, 

Or an old man upon a winter’s night.

You can check out the poem here:- 

Background Information:- 

This poem was written in 6 February 1915 after Yeats was asked by Henry James and Edith Wharton to compose a poem about World War I, which he refused to do. It comes under the genre of political poem. It was initially titled as “To a friend who has asked me to sign his manifesto to the neutral nations”. When the poem was published in 1916, in Edith Wharton’s anthology ‘The Book of the Homeless’, the title was “A Reason for Keeping Silent”. When it was reprinted in 1916, this time in W. B. Yeats’ collection ‘The Wild Swans at Coole’, it was given the title with which we recognise it today. 

(Image generated with the help of Google Gemini)

Analysis:- 

In this short poem, Yeats expresses his view that writers should not write about overly political “war poems”. Yeats gives a reason for this saying that poetry lacks the power to influence or “set right”, the political leaders who have already made their decisions. He says that the poet’s role is to merely entertain someone by capturing the beauty, youth, and the small comforts of domestic life, rather than comment upon global conflicts. This reflects Yeats’ view on separating art and politics. 

Now one must remember that this poem is written in an ironic manner. The main reason for this is because someone is asking Yeats to write a war poetry and while refusing he has the written the poem. This odd act can be considered a “refusal as assent”. Hence, the very act of writing, this poem gives it an air of irony.

Overall, “On Being Asked for a War Poem” is a multifaceted exploration of the relationship between art, politics, and personal conviction. Through irony and nuanced language, Yeats challenges conventional notions of the poet’s role in society while affirming the importance of artistic autonomy and integrity.

For a more detailed analysis, you can check out this video:- 

Words - 568

Images - 2

Videos - 2

Northrop Frye: The Archetypes of Literature

Northrop Frye's essay on the archetype of literature argues that stories across cultures and times share deep patterns. He identifies four main types (comedy, tragedy, romance, satire) that act like building blocks for countless books. By understanding these patterns, we can better appreciate the connections between different stories, even if they seem quite different on the surface. This blog is a thinking activity, assigned by Barad Sir, based on this essay. For more information you can check out this blog - The Archetypes of Literature. 

1. What is Archetypal Criticism? What does the archetypal critic do?

Imagine you're building a house. You can use different materials, shapes, and colors, but the basic structure stays the same: walls, roof, windows, doors. Archetypal criticism is like looking at houses from all over the world and noticing these common building blocks. In literature, archetypes are these recurring patterns, symbols, and characters that show up in stories across cultures and time periods. They're like the walls and roof of a story, holding everything together and giving it a familiar feel. Archetypal criticism isn't about saying all stories are the same. It's about recognising the underlying patterns that connect them and help us understand why they resonate with us so deeply.

An archetypal critic is like a detective searching for hidden patterns in literature. They identify the archetype, interpret its meaning, connect the dots and offer a new perspective on the work.

2. What is Frye trying prove by giving an analogy of 'Physics to Nature' and 'Criticism to Literature'?

Through this analogy, Frye says that literature, like nature, is an object of study. Just as physicists study nature to understand its laws and principles, critics study literature to understand its underlying patterns and structures. Both literature and nature exist independently of our study, but through analysis and observation, we can gain deeper insights into their workings.

Just as physics offers a set of laws and principles to explain natural phenomena, Frye argues that literary criticism can offer a systematic framework for understanding the underlying structures and patterns of literature. This framework, based on archetypes and genres, allows us to connect and compare different works across cultures and times. Hence, criticism provides a systematic framework for understanding literature.

3. Share your views of Criticism as an organised body of knowledge. Mention the relation of literature with history and philosophy.

Criticism, as an organised body of knowledge, serves as a framework for understanding and interpreting various forms of art, literature, and culture. It gives us tools and ways to study creative things. With this method, we can find hidden meanings, cultural contexts, and aesthetic principles in art. Criticism helps us understand and enjoy art better, creating conversations that teach us more about human experiences from different times and places.

The connection of Literature with History and Philosophy, is mentioned by Frye in his essay. He finds that literature is the central division of the “humanities,” flanked on one side by history and on the other by philosophy. Literature uses events from history and ideas from philosophy. One can understand this concept better by observing the chart below: 

4. Briefly explain inductive method with illustration of Shakespeare's Hamlet's Grave Digger's scene.

The inductive method is a form of reasoning where you draw general conclusions based on specific observations. Imagine climbing a ladder: you start with individual steps like specific observations and, as you climb higher, you gain a clearer view of the whole picture, which is general conclusion. One can understand it better with this equation: 

(Observations + Identifying Patterns = Forming a Conclusion) = Inductive Method

Applying Frye's inductive method to Hamlet's Grave Digger scene would involve closely examining the specific details of this scene and then deriving broader insights. In the Grave Digger's scene, one might analyse the symbolism of death, the juxtaposition of life and mortality, and Hamlet's contemplation of the human condition.

The scene opens with the gravediggers at work, and Hamlet's curiosity about the length of time it takes for a body to decompose. Through Hamlet's interaction with the gravediggers, we observe the blending of humour and profound reflection, creating a complex emotional tone. The gravediggers' banter about death and their casual approach contrast with the weighty theme of mortality. By examining this scene in the context of the play as a whole, we identify a pattern of Shakespeare using seemingly trivial or comic moments to delve into deeper existential and philosophical questions. The Grave Digger scene follows this pattern, providing a lens through which Hamlet contemplates the nature of life, death, and equality.

Inductively, we derive the general principle that Shakespeare employs multifaceted scenes to explore profound themes. The coexistence of humour and tragedy allows for a nuanced exploration of the human experience. Applying this method to the entire play, we can infer that Shakespeare uses various scenes and characters to weave a rich tapestry of existential questions, revealing the complexities of human existence and the inevitability of mortality. In summary, by inductively analysing the Grave Digger scene, we gain a deeper understanding of Shakespeare's thematic approach, revealing layers of meaning and insight into the broader philosophical concerns of "Hamlet."

5. Briefly explain deductive method with reference to an analogy to Music, Painting, rhythm and pattern. Give examples of the outcome of deductive method.

The deductive method is the opposite of inductive reasoning. Instead of climbing a ladder from specifics to general conclusions, it's like jumping down from established general principles to specific, guaranteed outcomes. Imagine dropping an apple - you already know that gravity pulls objects down, so you can deduce the specific outcome that the apple will fall. The example given below will help in understanding of deductive method:

Premise 1 = All humans are mortals

Premise 2 = Aristotle was a human

Conclusion = Aristotle was a mortal

Now let us understand this with analogy of music and painting. Imagine music composition as a deductive process. You start with established musical principles like scales, chords, and rhythms. Then, you apply logic and your creative vision to combine these elements in specific ways. The outcome is a new and unique piece of music that follows the underlying principles yet expresses your creativity.

Similarly, in painting, you begin with fundamental principles like colour theory, perspective, and composition. By employing logical choices and artistic skill, you arrange shapes, lines, and colours to create a specific image with the desired emotional impact.

6. Refer to the Indian seasonal grid (below). If you can, please read small Gujarati or Hindi or English poem from the archetypal approach and apply Indian seasonal grid in the interpretation. 

For my analysis, I have selected a Hindi poem by Suryakant Tripathi (Nirala). The poem is called, “सखि वसन्त आया” and it is as follows:- 

सखि वसन्त आया ।
भरा हर्ष वन के मन,
   नवोत्कर्ष छाया ।
किसलय-वसना नव-वय-लतिका
मिली मधुर प्रिय-उर तरु-पतिका,
   मधुप-वृन्द बन्दी--
  पिक-स्वर नभ सरसाया ।

लता-मुकुल-हार-गंध-भार भर,
बही पवन बंद मंद मंदतर,
      जागी नयनों में वन-
         यौवन की माया ।
आवृत सरसी-उर-सरसिज उठे,
केशर के केश कली के छुटे,
         स्वर्ण-शस्य-अंचल
          पृथ्वी का लहराया ।

The poem embodies the archetypal theme of renewal and rebirth, symbolised by the arrival of spring. The imagery of blossoming flowers, the fragrance of blossoms, and the overall rejuvenation of nature evoke a sense of new beginnings and vitality. And the poem aligns with the Indian seasonal grid, portraying the blossoming of nature during spring. It captures the essence of the season through vivid descriptions of blooming flowers, the gentle breeze, and the rejuvenating impact on the environment.

The use of metaphors, such as "किसलय-वसना" (fragrance of blossoms) and "मधुर प्रिय-उर तरु-पतिका" (beloved heart like a tree), adds layers of meaning. These metaphors can be interpreted archetypally, representing the eternal themes of love and beauty that bloom afresh with each spring. The poem harmonizes with cosmic elements, connecting the blooming flowers to the celestial beauty of the sky ("पिक-स्वर नभ सरसाया"). This interplay of earthly and celestial elements reinforces the cyclical nature of life and the interconnectedness of all things.

In summary, "सखि वसन्त आया" captures the archetypal essence of spring, portraying themes of renewal, nature's beauty, and the cosmic harmony within the context of the Indian seasonal grid. 

Words - 1361

Images - 5

For Whom The Bell Tolls

This blog is a thinking activity assigned by Megha Ma’am, based on the 1940 novel by Earnest Hemingway called, ‘For Whom The Bell Tolls’. 

About the Author:- 

Earnest Hemingway was an American author and journalist. He is known for his concise and impactful writing style. He won the noble prize in literature in 1954. His books are like immersive journeys that can take you to fascinating places and make you feel a lot of emotions. His most famous works include, ‘The Old Man and the Sea’, ‘The Sun Also Rises’ and ‘A Farewell To Arms’. To know more about Hemingway’s life, check out this short biography video:- 

’For Whom The Bell Tolls’ Explained:- 

The novel takes its title from John Donne‘s poem, “Meditation 17”.  This poem talks about dependence of human on other people and the inevitability of death. Both of these themes are presented in the novel as well. You can check out the poem here. 

“And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; 

it tolls for thee.”  

The novel begins in spring of 1937. The setting of the novel is the Spanish Civil War fought between Republicans, who were supported by America and Fascist, who were supported by Nazi Germany and Italy. The protagonist, Robert Jordan, is an American explosives expert who volunteers to the Republican side. He is given the mission to blow up a bridge that is in control of the Fascist. He has to work with the guerrilla fighters led by Pablo. Robert Jordan faces a lot of complications, including the division of the guerrilla group in regards to the bridge operation. Here he meets and falls in love with Maria. Throughout the novel, Robert Jordan struggles with questions of morality and the loss of life. At the end of the novel, we could witness a fierce battle, and the narrative ends with a wounded Robert Jordan, waiting for his enemies and his inevitable death. You can read further about it here. 

1. In what ways the Flashback Technique was used in ‘For Whom the Bell Tolls’.  

Ernest Hemingway's writing style is characterised by simplicity, directness, and a focus on understanding emotion. He writes in short sentences that are straightforward. He employs declarative sentences, minimising adjectives and adverbs. Hemingway's use of vivid imagery and precise language creates a stark and realistic portrayal of war. The novel's dialogue is notable for its authenticity, reflecting the speech patterns of the characters. Additionally, Hemingway's iceberg theory is evident, where much of the meaning is conveyed through what is left unsaid. This minimalist approach enhances the impact of the story's themes, emphasising the human cost of conflict.

Flashbacks technique is Engaging to the readers as it delves into the characters' pasts. It sheds light on their motivations, decisions, and present state. For example, early in the novel, Robert experiences a vivid flashback to his life in Montana. This flashback reveals his initial idealism about Spanish Civil War. He remembers his excitement about joining the fight against fascism, Fuelled by a sense of adventure and the desire to defend a just cause. This flashback contrast with his present disillusionment. The harsh realities of war have taken Away his initial enthusiasm. Through flashback, we can see the gap between Roberts, romantic expectations, and the devastating consequences of the conflict.

Another example is found in the character of Maria. Maria has a re occurring flashback of the abuse she suffered. This flashback shows the reader, her emotional state, as well as her initial distress towards Robert. The trauma of her past experiences haunts her still. This flashback helps the reader in understanding her emotional vulnerability. 

Hence, by employing the flashback technique Hemingway allows the readers to enter the characters mind and examine the events that made them the way they are.

Other than that, Flashbacks can also portray the relationship between characters. Karkov’s Flashback to his act of saving Andres and Gomez, strengthens the bond between them. It’s showcases his loyalty despite his outer gruff exterior. 

It is worth noting that, compared to other literary giants, Hemingway uses flashback techniques in a very restrained manner. His writing mostly focuses on the present moment and the immediate action and responses of characters. However, when employed flashback technique, serves a critical purpose in his narrative, by highlighting the psychological impact of past experiences, offering a deeper understanding of the characters motivations and creating a sense of contrast between past, and present.

2. Explain: Robert Jordan as a Typical Hemingway Hero.

The Hemingway Hero is a concept coined to describe the protagonist in Ernest Hemingway's works. This character is typically a stoic, courageous, and often flawed individual who faces life's challenges with grace, dignity, and a sense of honour, even in the face of adversity. The Hemingway Hero shows qualities such as bravery, self-reliance, and a code of ethics, often in the midst of chaotic environments. This archetype is prevalent in Hemingway's novels and short stories, embodying themes of masculinity, existentialism, and the human condition.

To understand the Hemingway Hero better you can check out this article by R. Savitha - “Characteristics of Hemingway’s Heroes in his Novels”. 

Based on this article several key characteristics of Hemingway hero become apparent to us. Let us examine some of the key characteristics and see how they are incorporated in Robert Jordan’s character. 

1. Physically or Psychologically Wounded:- 

The article states that the "Hemingway hero is a man who would never completely recover from his wounds, though he may learn to overcome some of his troubles and learn to live with some." It gives examples of Jake Barnes from ‘The Sun Also Rises’ being impotent from a war wound, Frederic Henry from ‘A Farewell To Arms’ was wounded in the legs during war, and Robert Jordan suffering emotional scars from his father's suicide as well as later physical wounds. The wounding represents trauma that shapes the hero's psyche.

2. Alienated from Society :-

Hemingway's heroes are oftentimes depicted as alienated from organised society. This is done by living abroad, deserting war, or by making a "separate peace" by cutting themselves off. The situation of Robert Jordan is quite different, in this matter, when compare to other Hemingway protagonists. Robert Jordan has been alienated from his  former life but he is not completely alone and isolated. He has companionship in the republican gurilla  soldiers.

3. Code of Conduct :-

In place of religious faith, the Hemingway hero lives by an unwritten code of values like courage, endurance, grace under pressure. The article calls this the "code hero" that exemplifies principles the wounded hero must follow. In ‘For Whom The Bell Tolls’, we see Robert Jordan’s unwavering dedication to his mission of blowing up the bridge. One can say that his dedication takes on “Religious proportions”. This shows Jordan living by Hemingway’s code of purpose, duty and grace. 

4. Hedonistic Streak :- 

While not solely hedonistic, the article notes the heroes do exhibit a tendency to "seek pleasure of the physical senses and material comforts" like drinking, womanising and adventure. This quality is seen in Robert Jordan to some extent. 

5. Men of Action :-

Admiring bullfighters, the heroes are passionate "men of action" who live by experiences and behaviours rather than just contemplation, embodying an ideal of primordial masculinity. This quality is also seen in Robert Jordan as he is a man of action and dislikes people like Pablo who are afraid to die. 

So in short, Hemingway's protagonist is a disillusioned, experiential man of action living by a strict moral code as he grapples with the traumas and pleasures of life in a seemingly meaningless universe. This archetype is not exclusive to Hemingway’s writings and we can see many examples of Hemingway hero in our cinema. One famous Example is Dr. Indiana Jones from Indiana Jones movie series. 

To know more about Hemingway Hero, you can check out this video:- 

Conclusion 

In conclusion, Ernest Hemingway skilfully employs the flashback technique in "For Whom the Bell Tolls" to enhance the story. By showcasing Jordan’s journey Hemingway embodies the Hemingway protagonist exploring themes of bravery, integrity and selflessness amidst turmoil. As readers delve into Jordans recollections they uncover insights into his motives and the intricate layers of his persona. Ultimately "For Whom the Bell Tolls" serves as a timeless tribute to Hemingway's storytelling prowess. 

Words - 1382

Images - 5

Videos - 2

References - 

Savitha, R. “CHARACTERISTICS OF HEMINGWAY’S HEROES IN HIS NOVELS.” International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, vol. 5, no. 10, 2017, p. 6, https://oaji.net/articles/2017/488-1511868460.pdf. Accessed 25 January 2024.

Transcendentalism

Transcendentalism is an American Philosophical idea that heavenly influenced American Literature. This blog is a thinking activity based on that. For more information, you can check out Vaidehi Ma’am’s blog - Transcendentalism. 

1. Transcendentalists talk about the Individual’s relation with Nature. What is Nature for you? Share your views.

Nature, to me, encompasses the entirety of the natural world around us - from the vast landscapes to the smallest of creatures. It's not merely trees, rivers, and mountains, but also the intricate ecosystems, the cycles of life and death, and the interconnectedness of all living things. Nature serves as a source of inspiration, a place of solace, and a reminder of our place in the world. It teaches us humility, resilience, and respect for all life forms. Our relationship with nature is fundamental to our existence, and nurturing it is essential for our well-being and the well-being of the planet.

2. Transcendentalism is an American Philosophy that influenced American Literature at length. Can you find any Indian/Regional literature or Philosophy that came up with such similar thoughts?

In Indian literature and philosophy, there are several schools of thought that share similarities with Transcendentalism in terms of their focus on individualism, spirituality, and connection with nature. A few of them are:- 

Advaita Vedanta - 

One notable example of transcendental ideas in Indian philosophy is the philosophy of Advaita Vedanta, which originated in ancient India and was developed further by scholars like Adi Shankaracharya.

Advaita Vedanta emphasizes the idea of the ultimate reality (Brahman) being non-dual, where the individual self (Atman) is essentially identical to Brahman. This concept underscores the interconnectedness of all beings and the idea that the true nature of existence transcends the limitations of the material world. Similar to Transcendentalism, Advaita Vedanta encourages self-realization, inner reflection, and a deep appreciation for the unity of all life.

To know more about this philosophy, check out this video:-

Religious texts of Hinduism -

In Indian literature, particularly in works like the Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita, there are themes of introspection, self-discovery, and the quest for spiritual enlightenment that resonate with Transcendentalist ideas. These texts explore the relationship between the individual and the cosmos, emphasising the importance of seeking truth and wisdom through direct experience rather than relying solely on external authorities.

Gujarati Tribal culture -

Gujarati tribal culture place a strong emphasis on the importance of nature. Transcendentalists believe in the inherent goodness of nature and the spiritual insights it offers. Similarly, many tribal communities in Gujarat have deep reverence for the natural world, often viewing it as sacred and essential to their spiritual and cultural identity. They may engage in rituals and practices that honour the land and its resources, reflecting a close bond with the environment. There are many songs celebrating this bond of nature and man. One such song is “Khajuri Neh Kevo” by Shailesh Vaghela. You can listen to it here:- 

Transcendentalists critiqued the materialism, and industrialisation of modern society, advocating for a return to simpler, more harmonious ways of living. Similarly, many tribal communities in Gujarat have faced challenges from modernization, urbanization, and encroachment on their traditional lands and way of life. They may share a sense of concern about the loss of cultural heritage and environmental degradation, echoing Transcendentalist critiques of modernity. I would like to share a sad song about how tribal people of Gir have to leave their lands for cities and this makes even the forest of Gir sad. 

3. Write in short about your understanding of the following essays according to the topics given: "The Great Lawsuit" Margaret Fuller

The Great Lawsuit (essay) By Margaret Fuller. Pptx from BhumiGohil1

Margaret Fuller's essay "Woman in the Nineteenth Century," also known as "The Great Lawsuit," published in 1845, marked a groundbreaking moment in the discourse on gender equality. As a prominent American writer, critic, and advocate for women's rights, Fuller boldly challenged the societal norms of her time that confined women to domestic roles. She argued fervently against the limitations imposed on women, advocating for their right to pursue intellectual endeavors and access education. Fuller envisioned a society where women could contribute meaningfully across various fields and professions, breaking free from traditional gender roles. She emphasized the importance of equal educational opportunities for women, believing that their intellectual development was crucial for societal progress.

At the heart of Fuller's message was a rejection of narrow definitions of femininity and masculinity. She explored the concept of a transcendent union of qualities within individuals, asserting that both men and women possessed a spectrum of capabilities. Fuller's essay not only called for women's rights but also delved into broader discussions about human potential and the need for a more inclusive and egalitarian society. Her ideas resonated with the burgeoning feminist movement of the time, influencing later activists such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton.

Fuller's essay played a significant role in shaping the conversation about gender roles and equality in the 19th century. It challenged the status quo and contributed to a growing awareness of the need for social and cultural transformation. Fuller's advocacy for women's rights and her broader exploration of gender dynamics laid the groundwork for future waves of feminism. In the historical context of the mid-1800s, when women's rights were fiercely debated, Fuller emerged as a powerful voice for change. Her legacy endures as a testament to the enduring power of ideas to inspire social progress and shape the course of history.

To know more about Transcendentalism, check out these videos:- 

Words - 917

Images - 2

Videos - 5